Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO)
Whether directors and officers of Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Investigation
11/15/2021
Initial Lawsuit
01/07/2022
Lawsuit Progression
06/03/2022
Were Talis’ statements made in connection with its initial public offering (IPO) and subsequent EUA application withdrawal for its Talis One COVID-19 test misleading? The company subsequently disclosed delays in launching and manufacturing.
This post is open for investors to gather facts, and findings and track their exposure to related lawsuits. We invite investors and shareholders to contribute to this investigation for their own benefit, add events to the factual timeline below and vote on events’ pertinence.
A lawsuit was subsequently filed. We will update this post as it unfolds.
08/10/2021
During its Q2 2021 earnings call, Talis’ management announces that “development timelines have been extended by delays in the launching of [Talis’s] COVID-19 test and manufacturing scale.” Talis also announces that it “expect[s] to see [its] first meaningful revenue ramp in 2022.”
CFO, Roger Moody added that “[i]t’s difficult to predict how much product revenue we will recognize this year, given the uncertainty around the timing of the EUA, our controlled launch, manufacturing scale-up and the variability of COVID testing market.”
Stock Impact
Close | Previous close | Price variation | Percentage variation |
---|---|---|---|
$8.39 | $8.97 | $-0.58 | -6.47% |
A shareholder filed a class action on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Talis common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with the company’s February 2021 initial public offering (IPO).
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors:
(1) that the comparator assay in the primary study lacked sufficient sensitivity to support Talis’s EUA application for Talis One COVID-19 test;
(2) that, as a result, Talis was reasonably likely to experience delays in obtaining regulatory approval for the Talis One COVID-19 test;
(3) that, as a result, the company’s commercialization timeline would be significantly delayed; and
(4) that, as a result of the foregoing, defendants’ positive statements about the company’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
06/03/2022
The court issued an order appointing the lead plaintiff and lead counsel.
Whether directors and officers of Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Inari Medical, Inc. (NARI) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.