BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (BTAI)
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.
Investigation
07/22/2021
Initial Lawsuit
02/04/2022
Lawsuit Progression
06/07/2022
Did New Oriental mislead investors?
Did the company issue statements regarding its marketing tactics, teacher qualifications, advertising practices, government warnings and risk of adverse enforcement actions & fines in violation of securities laws?
This post is open for investors to gather facts, and findings and track their exposure to related lawsuits. We invite investors and shareholders to contribute to this investigation for their own benefit, add events to the factual timeline below and vote on events’ pertinence.
A lawsuit was subsequently filed. We will update this post as it unfolds.
07/23/2021
Following alleged leak of internal government document, the Chinese Ministry of Education publishes new regulation banning companies that teach the school curriculum from making profits, raising capital or going public, effectively ending any potential growth in the for-profit tutoring sector in China. The regulations forbid the companies from going public or being acquired, foreign teachers outside mainland China from teaching and advertising and marketing.
(Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education, published by the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council.)
Stock Impact
Close | Previous close | Price variation | Percentage variation |
---|---|---|---|
$2.93 | $6.4 | $-3.47 | -54.22% |
This is a securities class action on behalf of all persons who purchased New Oriental American depository shares (ADSs) between April 24, 2018 and July 22, 2021, both dates inclusive.
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors:
(a) that New Oriental’s revenue and operational growth was the result of deceptive marketing tactics and abusive business practices that flouted Chinese regulations and policies and exposed the company to an extreme risk that more draconian measures would be imposed on the company;
(b) that New Oriental had engaged in misleading and fraudulent advertising practices, including the provision of false and misleading discount information designed to obfuscate the true cost of the company’s programs to its customers;
(c) that New Oriental had falsified teacher qualifications and experience in order to attract customers and increase student enrollments;
(d) that New Oriental had defied prior government warnings against linking school enrollments with the provision of private tutoring services;
(e) that, as a result of the foregoing, New Oriental was subject to an extreme undisclosed risk of adverse enforcement actions, regulatory fines and penalties, and the imposition of new rules and regulations adverse to the company’s business and interests; and
(f) that, as a result of the foregoing, defendants’ positive statements about the company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable factual basis.
06/07/2022
The court issued an order appointing the lead plaintiff and lead counsel.
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.