Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO)
Whether directors and officers of Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Investigation
11/16/2021
Initial Lawsuit
11/16/2021
Lawsuit Progression
02/22/2022
Investigation regarding Lightspeed’s statements about its customer count, transaction volume and revenue per user, following a report by Spruce Point Capital Management.
09/29/2021
Spruce Point Capital Management publishes a short thesis report about Lightspeed alleging that “a cash degenerative North American roll-up of point-of-sale commerce solutions, has covered up massive inflation of its Total Addressable Market (TAM), customer counts, and Gross Transaction Volume (GTV).”
The report and its press release further describes that “[e]vidence shows that Lightspeed massively inflated its business pre-IPO, overstating its customer count by 85% and gross transaction volume (‘GTV’) by 10% – a payment volume metric that a former employee described as ‘smoke and mirrors’”; that there was “[e]vidence of declining organic growth and business deterioration through Lightspeed’s IPO, despite management’s claims that Average Revenue Per User (‘ARPU’) is increasing”; and that the company’s “[r]ecent acquisition spree has come at escalating costs with no clear path to profitability, while management pursues aggressive revenue reporting practices.”
Stock Impact
Close | Previous close | Price variation | Percentage variation |
---|---|---|---|
$98.77 | $112.5 | $-13.73 | -12.2% |
This is a federal securities class action on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired Lightspeed securities between September 11, 2020 and September 28, 2021, both dates inclusive.
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors that:
(i) Lightspeed had misrepresented the strength of its business by, inter alia, overstating its customer count, gross transaction volume (GTV), and increase in Average Revenue Per User (ARPU), while concealing the company’s declining organic growth and business deterioration;
(ii) Lightspeed had overstated the benefits and value of the company’s various acquisitions;
(iii) accordingly, the company had overstated its financial position and prospects; and
(iv) as a result, the company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
02/22/2022
The court issued an order appointing the lead plaintiff and lead counsel.
04/27/2022
Lead plaintiff files this federal securities class action on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired Lightspeed securities between September 11, 2020 and September 28, 2021, both dates inclusive.
Operative complaint
06/27/2022
A motion to dismiss was filed with the court.
Whether directors and officers of Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Inari Medical, Inc. (NARI) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.