LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ)
Whether directors and officers of LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Investigation
04/14/2022
Initial Lawsuit
04/25/2022
Lawsuit Progression
06/24/2022
Investors investigation focused on Blue Orca Capital’s short report alleging that the company is “a high-risk cannabis bank, providing de facto loans to cannabis companies in exchange for long term leases.”
04/14/2022
Blue Orca Capital releases a report on Innovative Industrial Properties describing the company as “a marijuana bank masquerading as a REIT.” The report details the company’s largest tenant in default on debt and accused of being a Ponzi scheme, its second largest tenant accused of fraud between founders and its listed tenants struggling with their fallings share prices and cash flows.
“In exchange for overpaying for properties from cannabis companies and funding the tenant improvements to build out the facilities, IIPR receives repayment of the loan in the form of long-term lease agreements at 11–14% yields. In effect, IIPR is less of a traditional REIT, and more of a marijuana bank, lending to cannabis companies who otherwise would not have access to the banking system to grow their businesses“
Stock Impact
Close | Previous close | Price variation | Percentage variation |
---|---|---|---|
$169.68 | $183.44 | $-13.76 | -7.5% |
This is a class action on behalf of persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Innovative Industrial Properties securities between May 7, 2020 and April 13, 2022, inclusive.
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors:
(1) that Innovative Industrial Properties’ focus is to be a cannabis company lender rather than a real estate investment trust (REIT);
(2) that the true values of Innovative Industrial Properties’ properties are significantly lower than Innovative Industrial Properties represents;
(3) existential issues in its top customers;
(4) that as a result, its top customers may not be able to continue making payments to Innovative Industrial Properties and Innovative Industrial Properties would face significant issues replacing these customers; and
(5) that as a result, defendants’ statements about its business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
The lead plaintiff deadline has passed, we will update this page as the lawsuit progresses.
Last event retrieved on 10/07/2022.
Whether directors and officers of LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.
Whether directors and officers of Inari Medical, Inc. (NARI) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.