BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (BTAI)
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.
Investigation
11/05/2021
Initial Lawsuit
11/05/2021
Lawsuit Progression
01/10/2022
Dismissal
01/31/2022
Investigation regarding misleading statements made by American Century Capital Portfolios in connection with the issuing of American Century Value Fund shares (all classes).
09/30/2021
American Century Capital Portfolios, Inc., issuer of the American Century Value Fund, publishes on their website the quarterly value fact sheet for all share classes, namely the Investor Class (TWVLX), the I Class (AVLIX), the Y Class (AVUYX), the A Class (TWADX), the C Class (ACLCX), the R Class (AVURX), the R5 Class (AVUGX), and the R6 Class (AVUDX).
The sheet evidences annualized returns in comparison to benchmark indexes. For instance, the sheet shows an annualized 3-year Alpha metric of -1.57, meaning the fund underperformed the index.
Stock Impact
Close | Previous close | Price variation | Percentage variation |
---|---|---|---|
$9.55 | $9.7 | $-0.15 | -1.55% |
Plaintiff brings this securities class action on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired shares of each share class of the fund in continuous offerings pursuant to registration statements and prospectuses for the fund filed for a period commencing at the earliest date pursuant to the applicable three year statute of limitations, through the date of final judgment after trial. Share classes include the Investor Class (traded TWVLX), I Class (AVLIX), Y Class (AVUYX), A Class (TWADX), C Class (ACLCX), R Class (AVURX), R5 Class (AVUGX), and R6 Class (AVUDX).
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors that:
(i) The fund’s investment strategy was neither to identify companies whose stock price may not reflect the company’s value, nor to purchase the stocks of these undervalued companies and hold each stock until the price has increased to, or is higher than, a level the managers believe more accurately reflects the fair value of the company;
(ii) Defendants were not actively managing the Fund (which allegedly included researching and selecting investments for the Fund)
(iii) Defendants employed an investment strategy designed to closely track the performance of the fund’s stated benchmark index, the Russell 1000 Value index, known as “closet indexing”;
(iv) Defendants had no reason to charge a substantial fees to the Fund for this purportedly active management while engaging in closet indexing;
(v) The excessive fees virtually ensured that the fund could not match its benchmark over time, let alone outperform it, and;
(vi) As a result, the fund would consistently fail to meet or outperform its benchmark index.
The lead plaintiff deadline has passed, we will update this page as the lawsuit progresses.
Last event retrieved on 03/22/2022.
On 01/31/2022, plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the complaint.
Plaintiff Vera A. Hays hereby dismisses, without prejudice, her claims in the above-captioned action against all named defendants. This notice is being filed with the Court before defendants have served an answer or moved for summary judgment in this action, and before a class has been certified.
Free File
Stipulation/Order of Dismissal
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.