BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (BTAI)
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.
Investigation
08/01/2022
Initial Lawsuit
08/31/2022
Lawsuit Progression
To be active
Did TuSimple Holdings Inc. (TSP) mislead its shareholders regarding the safety of its autonomous driving trucks?
This post is open for investors to gather facts and findings and track their exposure to related lawsuits. We invite investors and shareholders to contribute to this investigation for their own benefit, add events to the factual timeline below and vote on events’ pertinence.
A lawsuit was subsequently filed. We update this post regularly.
07/25/2022
The Youtube channel The Asian Mai Show – Official Trucking Channel publishes a video entitled “Alleged Whistle Blower Shares Raw Video Of Self Driving Semi Truck Crashing Into Median 🤯“.
The video shows a TuSimple truck hitting the median and revealed a Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration May 26 letter to the company announcing a “safety compliance investigation” into TuSimple.
Stock Impact
Close | Previous close | Price variation | Percentage variation |
---|---|---|---|
$9.57 | $9.81 | $-0.24 | -2.45% |
A TuSimple Holdings Inc. (TSP) investor filed a federal securities class action on behalf of all persons who:
(a) purchased or otherwise acquired TuSimple common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with TuSimple’s April 15, 2021, initial public offering (IPO); and/or
(b) that purchased or otherwise acquired TuSimple securities between April 15, 2021, and August 1, 2022, both dates inclusive.
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors that:
(i) TuSimple’s commitment to safety was significantly overstated and the defendants concealed fundamental problems with the company’s technology;
(ii) TuSimple was rushing the testing of its autonomous driving technology in order to deliver driverless trucks to the market ahead of its more safety-conscious competitors;
(iii) there was a corporate culture within TuSimple that suppressed or ignored safety concerns in favor of unrealistically ambitious testing and delivery schedules;
(iv) the aforementioned conduct made accidents involving the company’s autonomous driving technology more likely;
(v) the aforementioned conduct invited enhanced regulatory scrutiny and investigatory action toward the company; and
(iv) as a result, the company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
This case is still in the Initial Lawsuit state.
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.