
Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO)
Whether directors and officers of Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Investigation
06/30/2019
Initial Lawsuit
12/23/2020
Lawsuit Progression
04/12/2021
Did Robinhood mislead consumers and fail to disclose that its operations relied extensively upon “payment for order flow,” in which it received payment from market makers in exchange for executing the service’s trades, at the expense of customers?
This post is open for investors to gather facts, and findings and track their exposure to related lawsuits. We invite investors and shareholders to contribute to this investigation for their own benefit, add events to the factual timeline below and vote on events’ pertinence.
A lawsuit was subsequently filed. We will update this post as it unfolds.
A Robinhood user filed a class action on behalf of all people in the United States or its Territories who were users of Robinhood between September 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019, and who placed orders in connection with which Robinhood’s received payment for order flow.
Excerpt
“Through a process of deceit and omission, Defendants misled consumers and failed to disclose that Robinhood’s business operations relied extensively upon “payment for order flow,” in which Defendants received payment from market makers in exchange for executing the service’s trades.
These payments often came at the expense of the consumer. While Defendants promoted and advertised an easy-to-use “commission free” trading platform, Defendants profited extensively from unsuspecting consumers who executed trades on Defendants’ platform at inferior execution prices compared to what consumers would have received from Robinhood’s competitors. For larger value orders, this price differential often exceeded the commission its competitors would have charged. These inferior prices were caused in large part by the unusually high charges Robinhood required from principal trading firms for the opportunity to obtain Robinhood’s customer order flow.”
04/12/2021
The court issued an order appointing the lead plaintiff and lead counsel.
01/05/2021
All persons in the United States or its Territories who were users of Robinhood between September 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019, and who placed orders in connection with which Defendants received payment for order flow.
Additional amended complaints have been filed, please refer to the last filed amended complaint for up-to-date information.
03/08/2022
All persons in the United States or its Territories who were users of Robinhood between September 1, 2016 and June 16, 2020 and who placed orders in connection with which Defendants received payment for order flow.
Operative complaint
03/29/2022
A motion to dismiss was filed with the court.
Whether directors and officers of Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Inari Medical, Inc. (NARI) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.