BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (BTAI)
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.
Investigation
12/10/2021
Initial Lawsuit
12/10/2021
Lawsuit Progression
02/08/2022
Investigation regarding Revance’s biologics license application (BLA) for DaxibotulinumtoxinA (DAXI) and following company receipt of Form 483 and complete response letter (CRL).
10/15/2021
Revance announces the receipt of a complete response letter (CRL) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding the Biologics License Application (BLA) for DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection, for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar (frown) lines.
“In a communication received on October 15, the FDA has determined it is unable to approve the BLA in its present form, and indicated that there are deficiencies related to the FDA’s onsite inspection at Revance’s manufacturing facility. Revance plans to request a Type A meeting with the FDA as soon as possible to address the deficiencies raised. No other deficiencies were identified in the CRL.”
Stock Impact
Close | Previous close | Price variation | Percentage variation |
---|---|---|---|
$13.81 | $22.71 | $-8.9 | -39.19% |
Plaintiff brings this is federal securities class action on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired Revance securities between November 25, 2019 and October 11, 2021, both dates inclusive.
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors that:
(i) quality control deficiencies existed at the company’s manufacturing facility for DAXI;
(ii) the foregoing deficiencies decreased the likelihood that the FDA would approve the DAXI BLA in its current form;
(iii) accordingly, it was unlikely that the DAXI BLA would obtain FDA approval within the timeframe the company had represented to investors; and
(iv) as a result, the company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
The lead plaintiff deadline has passed, we will update this page as the lawsuit progresses.
Last event retrieved on 10/02/2022.
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.
Whether directors and officers of Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.
Whether directors and officers of Inari Medical, Inc. (NARI) breached their fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders.