BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (BTAI)
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.
Investigation
07/26/2022
Initial Lawsuit
08/17/2022
Lawsuit Progression
10/17/2022
Did MINISO’s executives mislead investors regarding ownership of stores and undisclosed transactions?
This post is open for investors to gather facts, and findings and track their exposure to related lawsuits. We invite investors and shareholders to contribute to this investigation for their own benefit, add events to the factual timeline below and vote on events’ pertinence.
A lawsuit was subsequently filed. We update this post regularly.
07/26/2022
We are short $MNSO, a global Chinese retailer, because we think it lies about its business model, its chairman appears to have siphoned hundreds of millions via a crooked headquarters deal, and its retail business is secretly floundering. Full report at https://t.co/SsicUF1vPk pic.twitter.com/QZfd7IQc6E
— Blue Orca Capital (@blueorcainvest) July 26, 2022
Stock Impact
Close | Previous close | Price variation | Percentage variation |
---|---|---|---|
$6.13 | $7.21 | $-1.08 | -14.98% |
A MINISO Group Holding Limited (MSNO) shareholder filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded MINISO securities pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus issued in connection with MINISO’s October 2020 initial public offering.
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors that:
(1) Defendants and other undisclosed related parties owned and controlled a much larger amount of MINISO stores than previously stated;
(2) as a result, MINISO concealed its true costs;
(3) the company did not represent its true business model;
(4) Defendants, including the company and its chairman, engaged in planned unusual and unclear transactions;
(5) as a result of at least one of these transactions, the company is at risk of breaching contracts with PRC authorities;
(6) the company would imminently and drastically drop its franchise fees; and
(7) as a result, defendants’ statements about the company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
The lead plaintiff deadline has passed, we will update this page as the lawsuit progresses
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.