BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (BTAI)
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.
Investigation
03/10/2022
Initial Lawsuit
08/10/2022
Lawsuit Progression
10/11/2022
Did LifeStance mislead investors during its initial public offering (IPO) regarding its number of virtual/in-person ratio of visits & the number of physicians burning out?
This post is open for investors to gather facts, and findings and track their exposure to related lawsuits. We invite investors and shareholders to contribute to this investigation for their own benefit, add events to the factual timeline below and vote on events’ pertinence.
A lawsuit was subsequently filed. We update this post regularly.
08/11/2021
LifeStance reports its Q2 2021 financial results, a quarter closing a few days after the IPO, disclosing “net loss [of] $70.0 million compared to net loss of $27.6 million for the period from April 1, 2020 to May 14, 2020 (Predecessor) and $4.3 million for the period from April 13, 2020 to June 30, 2020 (Successor).”
The company further described that “loss from operations was $47.0 million, driven by stock and unit-based compensation of $29.5 million, a $10.0 million endowment to the LifeStance Health Foundation, and $8.1 million in Director and Officer insurance expense incurred in connection with the IPO. . .”
See more on Factual TimelineA LifeStance Health Group, Inc. investor filed a securities class action on behalf of all purchasers of the common stock of LifeStance pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with LifeStance’s June 10, 2021, initial public stock offering (IPO).
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors:
(a) that the number of virtual visits clients were undertaking utilizing LifeStance was decreasing as the COVID-19 lockdowns were being lifted, thereby flatlining the company’s out-patient/virtual revenue growth;
(b) that the percentage of in-person visits clients were undertaking utilizing LifeStance was increasing as the COVID-19 lockdowns were being lifted, thereby causing the company’s operating expenses to increase substantially;
(c) that LifeStance had lost a large number of physicians due to burn-out and, as a result, its physician retention rate had fallen significantly below the 87% highlighted in the registration statement and the company had been expending additional costs to onboard new physicians who were less productive than the outgoing physicians they were replacing; and
(d) as a result of the foregoing, LifeStance’s business metrics and financial prospects were not as strong as the IPO’s registration statement represented.
The lead plaintiff deadline has passed, we will update this page as the lawsuit progresses
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.