BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (BTAI)
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.
Investigation
12/22/2021
Initial Lawsuit
12/22/2021
Lawsuit Progression
04/18/2022
Investigation into DocuSign’s statements about the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on its business and growth and the subsequent recovery’s negative impact.
12/02/2021
During a conference call for its Q3 2022 financial results, Dan Springer described the “boost from COVID-19 over the past year and a half” leading to “exceptionally high growth rates at scale” as the company “captured customer demand at an unprecedented pace.”
Regarding decelerating billings and lower than expected Q4 outlook Springer explained that they “expected there to be a reduction of that really heightened COVID buying, which drove [their] growth rates dramatically higher than they had ever been even as [they] got bigger.” The revelation came in contradiction with statements made during the Q2 2022 earnings call on September 2, 2021, where he assured investors they were “going to continue to have strong growth rates” because they were “not seeing any differences in churn rates in any meaningful way.”
Stock Impact
Close | Previous close | Price variation | Percentage variation |
---|---|---|---|
$135.09 | $233.82 | $-98.73 | -42.22% |
Plaintiff brings this federal securities class action on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased the publicly traded securities of DocuSign between March 27, 2020 and December 2, 2021, both dates inclusive.
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors that:
(1) the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on DocuSign’s business was positive, not negative;
(2) DocuSign misrepresented the role that theCovid-19 pandemic had on its growth;
(3) DocuSign downplayed the impact that a ‘return to normal’ would have on the company’s growth and business; and
(4) as a result, defendants’ publics statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.
04/18/2022
The court issued an order appointing the lead plaintiff and lead counsel.
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.