This investigation concerns Bumble’s secondary public offering statements about its paying user growth trends, price hike and transition of its payment platform.
11/10/2021
Bumble discloses its Q3 2021 financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2021, or 17 days after its filed its prospectus for Blackstone to sell up to 20.7 million shares at $54 per share. Bumble discloses 2.866 million average total paying users as of September 30, 2021, up from 2.865 in the previous quarter as reported in the September 13, 2021 prospectus (0.03% increase) or, in the alternative, down from 2.927 million (2.08% decrease) as reported in the Q2 2021 press release filed on August 11, 2021.
Stock Impact
Close | Previous close | Price variation | Percentage variation |
---|---|---|---|
$38.56 | $47.75 | $-9.19 | -19.25% |
This is a securities class action on behalf of all purchasers of the Class A common stock of Bumble directly in Bumble’s secondary public stock offering which took place on or about September 10, 2021.
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors:
(a) that Bumble’s paying user growth trends had abruptly reversed in 3Q21 and the company had actually lost tens of thousands of paying users during the quarter;
(b) that paying users had been more reluctant to sign up for the Bumble app during 3Q21 because of the recent price hike for paid services on the app;
(c) that a material number of paying users were leaving the Badoo app and/or could not make payments through the Badoo app due, in substantial part, to problems arising from the company’s transition of its payment platform; and
(d) as a result of the foregoing, Bumble’s business metrics and financial prospects were not as strong as the September 2021 secondary public offering registration statement had represented.
08/25/2022
The court issued an order appointing the lead plaintiff and lead counsel.
10/07/2022
Plaintiffs bring this action as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3) on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded Class A common stock of Bumble directly in or traceable to the Secondary Public Offering (SPO) between September 10, 2021 and January 24, 2022, inclusive, and who were damaged thereby.
Operative complaint
11/18/2022
A motion to dismiss was filed with the court.
On 03/31/2023, lead counsel Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP announced a proposed class action settlement.
The court preliminarily approved the settlement on 04/14/2023. The settlement has a total value of $18,000,000 in Cash.
The notice states that you may be included, if you purchased or otherwise acquired the company’s publicly traded common stock during the period from 09/10/2021 to 01/24/2022, inclusive.
According to the notice, the estimated average cash recovery per damaged share of common stock will be approximately $N/A per share, before deduction of court-approved fees and expenses. Lead Counsel filed a motion for an award of attorneys’ fees not to exceed 25% of the $18,000,000 and payment of expenses not to exceed $200,000.
For information purposes only, last updated on 05/23/2023. Contact the claims administrator or lead counsel for further information.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience.By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of all the cookies.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
_GRECAPTCHA | This cookie is set by Google reCAPTCHA, which protects our site against spam enquiries on forms. | |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
PHPSESSID | Session | This cookie is required for our website functionality and security. It is a session cookie, it will disappear when your session ends. |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
wfwaf-authcookie | This cookie is necessary to keep our website secure. | |
wordpress_logged_in | This Cookie indicates when you’re logged in, and who you are, for most interface use. It is required for the website to work properly. | |
wordpress_sec_ | This cookie is useful for logged-in users. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
_ga | 2 years | This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors. |
_ga_CK1P5E8CVW | 2 years | This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to persist session state. |
_gid | 24 hours | This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the website is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages visted in an anonymous form. |
Cookie |
---|
Google AdSense |
A securities class action lawsuit is a lawsuit on behalf of investors considered in a similar position, who purchased or sold securities of a company during a certain period and suffered losses because of an alleged wrongdoing. Security is often broadly defined to include bonds, stocks, options, derivatives, and other instruments.
Section 10b of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 makes it unlawful to “use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security” a “manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the [SEC] may prescribe.” 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b). It is therefore forbidden to: employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made not misleading; or engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
Generally, to be successful, the plaintiff must plead the following:
We invite you to read this article from the American Bar Association which, although from 2014, provide ample information to explore the world of class actions brought under section 10b of Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 provides “an express right of action for damages . . . when a registration statement contains untrue statements of material fact or omissions of material fact.” (Thomas Lee Hazen, Treatise on the Law of Securities Regulation, §7.3 at 581 (4th ed. 2002)). Practically, buyers in an initial public offering (IPO), relying on the registration statement and prospectus, are given the right to file a complaint against the company and other signatories for losses sustained as a result of the deficient registration statement and prospectus.
Generally, at least four elements must be plead for the claim to survive:
A shareholder derivative lawsuit is a lawsuit brought by a shareholder of a company, on behalf of the company, against an insider (director, board of directors, executives) or a third-party to redress wrongs and harms to the company. Simply speaking, this mechanism exists because one cannot expect directors and insiders to sue themselves for harms they have done to the company.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) of 1995 was enacted to tighten requirements for securities class actions to be brought in the United States. One of the mechanism put in place was a 60-day period, following the filing of the initial securities class action, for any shareholder considered in similar position to the one filing the initial class action complaint, to ask to be named lead plaintiff. Practically, any time a securities class action falling under the PSLRA is filed with a court, law firms advertise their willingness to pursue the case and invite other investors similarly situated to contact them.
The lead plaintiff in a securities class action is a shareholder who suffered losses related to the purchase or sale of a company’s security during a certain period of time, that is appointed with its choice of counsel to represent the rest of the similarly situated shareholders. To be appointed lead plaintiff, you need to contact a law firm, have them examine your losses and agree to be represented by them and ask to make a motion with the court to be appointed lead. The court will then look at all the motions from the different shareholders and make its decision based on a certain set of criteria. Your inability to be lead plaintiff shall not prevent you from any potential recovery in the event of a settlement.
A class period is a set period of time during which the purchasers or sellers of a company’s security claim in a class action lawsuit to have suffered losses. Class periods are based on the merits of the case and may evolve with the litigation.
A class action complaint will define the initial class of investors: the class period and the persons included in the class. You should look at the definition of the class to determine whether you are included or not. However, the class definition will evolve with the litigation. Its definition is very likely to change between the initial complaint filed and the possible settlement. Generally speaking, you should rely on the definitions of the class stated in a stipulation of settlement to determine whether or not you will be entitled to any recovery (see below about the opting-out mechanism).
You may. The mechanism is called opting-out of class. A lead plaintiff will agree on the potential recovery ratio in a settlement. You may have an interest in opting-out of a class if you have sustained large losses and believe bringing a separate lawsuit would entitle you to a larger ratio of recovery.
You may be able to bring a claim to arbitration in certain scenarios. We encourage you to contact a law firm of your choice to inquire about such alternative dispute resolution mechanism.
We have temporarily disabled auto-updates, the information on this page may not be up to date.