BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (BTAI)
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.
Investigation
01/26/2021
Initial Lawsuit
01/26/2021
Lawsuit Progression
04/28/2021
Did AstraZeneca mislead investors regarding its AZD1222 clinical trials? Manufacturing errors, half-dosage, timing of dosage, subgroups of patients, patient age, flaws in design and errors in execution.
This post is open for investors to gather facts, and findings and track their exposure to related lawsuits. We invite investors and shareholders to contribute to this investigation for their own benefit, add events to the factual timeline below and vote on events’ pertinence.
A lawsuit was subsequently filed. We will update this post as it unfolds.
11/23/2020
The company announces the release of the interim analysis of its ongoing trial for the vaccine candidate. This time however, the interim analysis shows two smaller scale trial in disparate locations (UK and Brazil) with two different dosing regimens. In addition, Dr. Moncef Slaoui the head of Operation Warp Speed, told reporters that the vaccine had not originally be tested in people over 55 and the the company could not explain the differences between the trial results (because of the unexplained exclusion of certain subgroups from the reported results).
Stock Impact
Close | Previous close | Price variation | Percentage variation |
---|---|---|---|
$53.66 | $54.246349779382 | $-0.59 | -1.08% |
An investor filed a securities class action on behalf of all purchasers of AstraZeneca American Depositary Shares between May 21, 2020 and November 20, 2020, inclusive.
According to the complaint, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants allegedly failed to disclose to investors:
(a) that initial clinical trials for AZD1222 had suffered from a critical manufacturing error, resulting in a substantial number of trial participants receiving half the designed dosage;
(b) that clinical trials for AZD1222 consisted of a patchwork of disparate patient subgroups, each with subtly different treatments, undermining the validity and import of the conclusions that could be drawn from the clinical data across these disparate patient populations;
(c) that certain clinical trial participants for AZD1222 had not received a second dose at the designated time points, but rather received the second dose up to several weeks after the dose had been scheduled to be delivered according to the original trial design;
(d) that AstraZeneca had failed to include a substantial number of patients over 55 years of age in its clinical trials for AZD1222, despite this patient population being particularly vulnerable to the effects of COVID-19 and thus a high priority target market for the drug;
(e) that AstraZeneca’s clinical trials for AZD1222 had been hamstrung by widespread flaws in design, errors in execution, and a failure to properly coordinate and communicate with regulatory authorities and the general public;
(f) that, as a result of (a)-(e) above, the clinical trials for AZD1222 had not been conducted in accordance with industry best practices and acceptable standards and the data and conclusions that could be derived from the clinical trials was of limited utility; and
(g) that, as a result of (a)-(f) above, AZD1222 was unlikely to be approved for commercial use in the United States in the short term, one of the largest potential markets for the drug.
04/28/2021
The court issued an order appointing the lead plaintiff and lead counsel.
07/12/2021
Lead plaintiff brings this securities class action on behalf of all purchasers of AstraZeneca American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) between June 15, 2020 and January 29, 2021, inclusive.
Operative complaint
09/27/2021
A motion to dismiss was filed with the court.
Confidential investigation: officers & directors’ potential breach of fiduciary duties to investors.